News RSS Feed


Solicitor on porn charges walks free

11:56am Saturday 29th September 2007

comment Comments (12)   Have your say »


A SOLICITOR who downloaded hundreds of indecent images of children from the internet has walked free from court.

Brian Rangeley hunted for and stored the sickening pictures a few months before he got married.

But the 49-year-old is now finished as a lawyer, has been left by his wife and turned to drink to cope with his depression.

Colin Meeke, prosecuting, told Swindon Crown Court that Rangeley's offending came to light in September last year when he was arrested for another matter.

Although that matter was not proceeded with police examined his computer and uncovered the illicit pictures.

Mr Meeke said that a total of 705 images were found and while the bulk were in the less serious categories, almost 100 were of the most vile kind.

When he was questioned he at first told police that he had no interest in children though was a naturist and sometimes saw them naked.

However, after his computer was examined he accepted that for a relatively short period in 2002 he had downloaded indecent images of children from the internet.

Mr Meeke said that it was also found that he had used the words paedophile' and Lolita' in search engines.

He said Rangeley accepted that he had downloaded the pictures so he could look at them again later. "He accepted that what he had been doing was unacceptable," Mr Meeke told the court.

Rangeley, of Tydeman Street, Gorse Hill, pleaded guilty to seven counts of making indecent images of children and one of possession between February 3 and May 8, 2002.

Philip King, defending, said that his client had lost everything as a result of the conviction.

Rangeley had been a solicitor since 1985, working in a practice in London before setting up on his own.

He married towards the end of 2002, after the offending, and moved his business to Swindon.

Mr King said that he now faced being struck off as a solicitor and had been left by his wife as a result of the crimes.

Rangeley started to look at the images out of curiosity, he said, but soon realised what he was doing was wrong and stopped.

He told the court his client clearly had an interest in what he saw but added: "Very soon that interest turned to disgust."

Since his arrested he said his client had suffered what he thought was a form of nervous breakdown, rarely going out, having panic attacks and drinking up to a litre of whisky a day.

Passing sentence Recorder Neil Ford QC said: "You are now a man who has lost his means of making a living.

"You have descended into maybe not clinical depression but depression in the normal sense of the word."

He passed a six-month jail term but suspended it for two years and ordered that he be placed on the sex offenders' register for seven years.


Your Say YourThis Is Wiltshire

walter, wilshur says...
12:49pm Sat 29 Sep 07

The usual "handshake" afterwards, no doubt?

jb, says...
1:17pm Sat 29 Sep 07

Walter, you are a terible man to be so cynical.
Bet a weeks wages you are dead right though.
say after me...
"is there no help fr a widows son"

Yali, says...
1:45pm Sat 29 Sep 07

Two levels of justice of course.

Chris, says...
9:15pm Sat 29 Sep 07

He sounds like any other normal solicitor to me.

A bit more £ex at the bar though.

jarge, bordeaux (British exile) says...
6:36am Sun 30 Sep 07

QUOTE"Mr Meeke said that it was also found that he had used the words paedophile' and Lolita' in search engines"

This should have been inadmissable in court. i might use the word "nuclear" in a search engine but it doesn't mean I'm about to wipe Trowbridge off the map!!

Mickie13, swindon or thereabouts says...
9:27am Sun 30 Sep 07

I've been following the articles on this story and am disgusted at the blatant disregard for facts and interjection of personal opinion. This is more akin to gossip mongering than reporting. I'd like to see how the editor's private life would hold up to such scrutiny..or anybody's for that matter. Ahem. Let he who casts the first stone...

jb, says...
12:17pm Sun 30 Sep 07

you another one of them then mickie?

SwindonNF, Swindon says...
2:46pm Sun 30 Sep 07

I am not surprised he got away with this. That is the sick government we are currently ruled by.
This pervert walks free on charges of that nature, but i have known a good, decent, law abiding man go to jail for advertising his house as 'For Sale - to a white family only'. Whats worse?

Paedophiles! The only hope is the rope

Vote NF

Grunion, wb says...
6:12pm Sun 30 Sep 07

Mickie13 wrote:
I've been following the articles on this story and am disgusted at the blatant disregard for facts and interjection of personal opinion. This is more akin to gossip mongering than reporting. I'd like to see how the editor's private life would hold up to such scrutiny..or anybody's for that matter. Ahem. Let he who casts the first stone...
Sorry im not sure whether or not you are advocating his actions or not ?
Are you saying that if someone admits having such filth on their computer they must be a victim of some gossip campaign - the Editors personal life has nothing to do with this and you are using that to divert from the original post . He should serve a mimimum jail sentence for this offence end of , and then hung by his clammies until they go black for good measure .

Mickie13, says...
7:07pm Sun 30 Sep 07

Sorry im not sure whether or not you are advocating his actions or not ?
Are you saying that if someone admits having such filth on their computer they must be a victim of some gossip campaign - the Editors personal life has nothing to do with this and you are using that to divert from the original post . He should serve a mimimum jail sentence for this offence end of , and then hung by his clammies until they go black for good measure .


One does not need to be a genious to see that this 'newspaper' has an agenda to exploit this story by interjecting opinion rather than just reporting the facts. I am an advocate for unbiased journalism.

Grunion, wb says...
7:51pm Sun 30 Sep 07

mickie13.

It is fact - he admitted it there is no reason to be biased or unbiased - was Osama bin laden given unbiased pressed after the events of 911-i think not .

So tell us all what are the facts seeing as you seem to be privvy to them .

Grunion, wb says...
7:52pm Sun 30 Sep 07

Or should i say what are the REAL FACTS !!

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »