News RSS Feed


Father explains Batman protest

12:01pm Friday 8th August 2008

comment Comments (18)   Have your say »


ESTRANGED dad Tim Line is staging a rooftop protest at the home of Lord Justice Sir Mathew Thorpe in High Street, Seend.

Mr Line, 45, has joined the Fathers 4Justice group and is dressed in a Batman suit.

He climbed up a ladder this morning at about 5am and intends to stay on top of the roof for two days, until after the Seend Fete tomorrow afternoon.

Sir Mathew, one of the country's most senior appeal judges and who has presided over family court hearings, is understand not to be at home. Police officers are at the house and keeping a watching brief.

Mr Line lived in Seend for 13 years but moved to Hilpteron near Trowbridge when his marriage broke down two years ago.

A former sergeant in the Royal Artillery Mr Line is now a self employed fencing contractor.

He said he had chosen today because it was the first anniversary of his last contact with his three daughters, aged 15, 14 and 12.

A district judge ordered him to have no contact other than to write to his daughters after hearing that his daughters did not want to see Mr Line.

Mr Line said he had written but had not received a reply so didn't know if his daughters had received his letters.

He also disputes that his daughters don't want to see him.

Sir Mathew has not sat on any of Mr Line's court hearings to do with his children.

Mr Line said he had chosen Sir Mathew's house to stage his protest as he is one of the most senior judges in the country and had the power to change the law at family courts or influence politicians.

Mr Line unfurled a banner on top of Sir Mathew's house which says "I can live with anyone else's kids but not my three girls. Dad loves you all. No contact for 365 days. Family courts harm children."

Speaking to the Gazette from the roof by phone he said: "I have had no contact with my three girls for a year today. They only live 300 metres from where I am stood. You can imagine how painful that is.

"I have written to them and send them Christmas and birthday presents but have heard nothing. I want them to know that I love them and want to pay a meaningful role in their lives.

"I'm not a nutter. Other than a parking fine I have not been in court before. I want things to change, I want to see my girls. Fathers4Justice is not a load of crackpots, we are trying to make the Government and family law courts to try and change a few things which are not only damaging fathers but children as well."

He said family courts should work towards both parents having equal responsibility for their children and mediation should be a requirement.

He said it took him an hour and a half to climb up on to Sir Mathew's house and he was alone.

He has with him a flask of coffee, a stove and food and waterproof clothing.

He removed a Union Jack flag which was flying and replaced it with a purple flag, purple is the colour adopted by Fathers4Justice and symbolises equality.

Mr Line added: "I haven't caused any damage to the house and I haven't been abusive and don't intend to be. It was very difficult to get on to the roof but it was far easier to get on the roof than it is to see my children."

A few people gathered to see Mr Line including Daniel Waylen, 19, a resident of The Lye, Seend.

He said: "I have known him when he lived in Seend. He was in the Army but I never thought he would do something like this. It's a bit harsh for the judge, social life is different to work like."

Sir Mathew's home has been targed by Fathers4Justice before with members holding peaceful protests outside his home.


Your Say YourThis Is Wiltshire

mav, devizes says...
2:56pm Fri 8 Aug 08

looks like his children dont want to see him. Wonder why there was a court order not letting him see his children !!!. Shame its going to rain on Saturday

James Munby, Manningford Bruce says...
3:00pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Well done Tim Lines! These corrupt courts do nothing other than line the pockets of the Solicitors and Barristers who represent warring parents.

If every father who had been shafted in these places took to such protest, these injustices would soon stop. Like the point Tim makes on his banner, he's able to live with anyone else's children but not get to see his own, that in itself makes the biggest statement of all about the insanity of family law in the UK.

Have no guilt about infringing on Thorpe's privacy; Thorpe himself presides over a legal system that a) removes a fathers' children for no reason without giving a second's thought and b) refuses to enforce contact orders upon a mother.

If you don't believe this, then read FAMILY COURT HELL by Mark Harris, the only book that can-and does-expose just what goes on.

mav, devizes says...
3:14pm Fri 8 Aug 08

mindless action like this and humiliating his children in public. Dont think he is doing himself any favours. Cant think of many teenage children who would want to see their father after a stunt like this

ickle.sam, ickle.sam@hotmail.co .uk says...
3:38pm Fri 8 Aug 08

I say fair play to him.... dads have just as much rights as mums to see their children. Just because someone doesnt want something to happen doesnt mean there is a genuine reason for it other than being spiteful so I think the person who made the comment about there being a reason for the court order against him re think.

His children arent exacually old enough to get in their cars and drive and see their dad and the children i am sure ask about their dad unless the mother has filled their heads with stories and lies.

GO MAN GO! I live in Seend and if you get hungry i'll throw you up a sandwich!!!

Philippa, Devizes says...
4:33pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Tim is certainly not a nutter and he is obviously at his wits end because of the injustice of his treatment by the courts. Good luck to him

neilrichardson, Bristol says...
4:52pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Well done Tim

Anyone that has been through the family court system will know how unfair and bias they are.

Why do they operate in secret againgst all principles of British Justice ? To ensure the old boy next looks after each other thats why, robbig fathers of money they would rather be spending on their children.

Transparency in Family Law please, not state sponsored corruption.

Rain wont be a problem for a war veteran fit to fight for country but not so see his children, - Some Government we have isn't it !!

lovingdad, wiltshire says...
5:31pm Fri 8 Aug 08

THE CHILDREN DO NOT WANT TO SEE HIM? I WONDER?!!MOST CHILDREN DO NOT WANT TO GO TO SCHOOL ON SOME DAYS OR EAT THEIR VEGGIES, DO WE SAY OK FAIR ENOUGH THEN? WAS MUM IN THE ROOM WHEN THE CHILDREN WERE ASKED IF THEY DID NOT WANT TO SEE HIM? WERE THEY JUST COVERING THEIR BACKS BY SAYING THIS COS THEY KNOW THAT IS WHAT MUM WANTS THEM TO SAY?
"TRANSPARENCY IN FAMILY COURTS" AS MENTIONED EARLIER WOULD RESOLVE ALL THIS, jUDGES TO BE MADE ACCOUNTABLE FOR THEIR ACTIONS, AND BOTH MOTHERS AND FATHERS WOULD BE HAPPIER I AM SURE. ALL THESE DEALINGS BEHIND CLOSED DOORS DO NOT HELP ANYBODY ESPECIALLY THE CHILDREN.
A CHILD IN MY FAMILY HAS REQUESTED MANY TIMES SHE WANTS TO LIVE WITH HER FATHER BUT MUM HAS SAID SHE WOULD KILL THE FATHER IF THIS HAPPENS. SO THANKS TO A CERTAIN JUDGE IN BRISTOL WHO WOULD NOT LISTEN TO THE TEENAGER OR TO THE ADULTS SHE HAD EXPRESSED HER WISHES TO SHE STILL LIVES WITH MUM, AND DAD HAS NOT SEEN HER FOR A FEW YEARS NOW, COS MUM DOES NOT BRING HER SHE IS IGNORING THE COURT ORDER AND BRISTOL JUDGES WILL NOT ENFORCE THE ORDER OR SPEAK TO CHILD, COS QUOTE "MUM HAS TO BE KEPT HAPPY AT ALL TIMES, COS IF MUM IS UNHAPPY SO ARE THE CHILDREN" WATCH THE PAPERS I THINK THIS CHILD WILL BE DOING A DEMO OF HER OWN WHEN SHE IS 18 GIVING HER SIDE OF THE STORY AND I IMAGINE IT WILL BE HARROWING. lETS HOPE THE JUDGE IN QUESTION IS STILL ALIVE TO HEAR HER STORY. THERE ARE GOOD AND BAD MUMS AND DADS BUT WHILST FAMILY COURTS ARE NOT ACCOUNTABLE THEN THE BAD MUMS WILL NEVER GO AWAY AND ALL DADS WILL BE TARRED WITH THE SAME BRUSH.

Er Uncle, UK says...
5:46pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Why oh why are there 3 Police vehicles on site and i dread to think how many officers!
I was under the impression Police resources were extremely limited in out County.
No doubt there will be a brawl in the town tonight and guess what - not a copper to be found!
Who ever is responsible for the placing of police officers on our streets has surely lost touch with their senses.

If this is what it takes for Batman to get the attention of the law/judges/public ect.....fair play to him. You have my support for sure.

Grant, Marlborough says...
6:36pm Fri 8 Aug 08

he will be down in a while when his Mum calls him!
"Batman! Dinner, dinner, dinner, dinner, Batman!"

DingDonG, Wilds of Wiltshire says...
7:06pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Police officers are at the house and keeping a watching brief.
Does that mean the Judge may pop home to change his knickers?

acey, says...
7:27pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Well done Tim!!!!

Judge Thorpe should pin his ears back and listen and implement the 4 points of reform.
1. MAKE COURTS OPEN and not secret.
2.ENFORCE COURT ORDERS
3.CREATE AN AUTOMATIC PRESUMPTION OF 50/50 CONTACT FOR BOTH PARENTS WHEN THEY SPLIT.
4.COMPULSORY MEDIATION: Before the court process and NOT after.

To those ignoramus's that have critizized Tim, I urge you to realise the implications of these spiteful mothers and corrupt family court system, that prevents dads from seeing their kids. Tim is at his wits end and has no other means to fight back and let his kids know that he loves them.

KEEP ON KEEPING ON.
TO ALL DADS: FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS!!!!

acey, HELL says...
8:46pm Fri 8 Aug 08

I agree Mr. Munby with your comments regarding this commentator "MAZ". She could quite easily be one of those spiteful selfish mothers who only care about themselves. They are the type that put their feelings first before that of the child. They are completely thick and don't realise the rammifications and effects on the child with their irresponsible actions. In short, these women are scum. If, she's not one of those women, then she's probably in the judiciary.....but then again, I think she sounds too thick to be a lawyer. I think I was right first time......she's a spiteful, selfish mother, who probably prevents contact.


Tony Ashby, Leicester says...
11:20pm Fri 8 Aug 08

Well done Tim
You are a true SUPERHERO

James Munby, Manningford Bruce says...
10:57am Sat 9 Aug 08

Sooner or later Thorpe and his judicial cretins will realise that when Dad's get fair treatment in their courts, we will all go away!

DevizesLad, Devizes says...
12:57am Sun 10 Aug 08

Well done Tim. Keep fighting for your rights!

barbarella68, calne says...
7:09pm Sun 10 Aug 08

28 years ago when I was 12 years old, my mum and dad divorced and my dad who was abusive to us kids and my Mum,was told by the court that he could have contact with us 4 kids,she protested but she was told she was being unreasonable.Well on one of our visits to my dad because my dad had got himself a new girlfriend and we didn't say hello to her quick enough he beat up all 4 of us breaking my arm and I lost part of my ear,my sisters also got a broken rib,collar bone.After it went back to court (closed court by the way)my dad got community service and my mum was told if she didn't send us she would be imprisoned.
I am 40 now and I can honestly say that it ruined my life,courts don't always make the right decisions,but everybody thought my dad was great and couldn't understand why my mum divorced him.Just because someone tells you they are innocent of something doesn't mean they are.There are some women who use children and there are also men who use children to hurt their ex,not all men or women are the same.Do you really think climbing on a roof will change anything,I have read the story and to be honest I can't even remember his name like many of these people who do these things after a few days it is forgotten as a publicity stunt.There must be another way!And calling people names who have an opinion is childish not helpful,but I am waiting for myself to be called names,which will just prove my point.

geddi, calne says...
9:47pm Sun 10 Aug 08

I sympathise with this father entirely. Having been involved with family courts since 1988, when I was told by my solicitor: "Stay calm and patient, the new 'Children's Act' comes in soon, it'll all be ok after that.." and then being an original victim of that toothless act which discriminates against fathers at the whim and will of embittered mothers as often as not. I spent 11 years and almost ended in a serious mental break down. The emotional fallout is still settling on my eldest son and I occasionally wake from nightmares in memory of those times.

I did not fight the way Fathers For Justice are and in many ways I wish I had!

Keep fighting Tim, and all the other fathers who are outlawed and marginalised from their children's lives, not because they are a danger to their children, or because they have caused or threatened to cause them harm, but simply because Mum made a fuss and some fussy old judge has agreed with Mum!

When justice is served, no-one will need to wear stupid outfits any more...

Monster Brief, Trowbridge says...
11:06pm Mon 11 Aug 08

Barbarella68 - your story sounds very sad. Clearly, the Family Courts failed to safeguard you and your sisters. The tragedy is that they are still failing children.

There is no other way to change things - the only way to challenge power is by public protest.

I applaud Tim's courageous stand to highlight the daily injustice and child abuse being meted out in the secret Family Courts by Jurassic judges out of touch with modern society.

Comments are closed on this article.

Local Advertisers


Local Information

Enter your postcode, town or place name

House prices »   Schools »   Crime »   Hospitals »