Councillor wants meetings to be Tweeted
12:00pm Sunday 17th March 2013 in Latest News
A Swindon Council meeting
A SENIOR Swindon councillor is encouraging members to Tweet during meetings in a bid to boost public engagement in the authority’s decisions.
Coun Dale Heenan, cabinet member for strategic planning and sustainability, is encouraging the use of Twitter and other social media following calls for meetings to be filmed and broadcast live online, which he claims would be costly and less effective.
Officers worked up a feasibility study into webcasting meetings following a campaign by Coun Mark Dempsey, the deputy Labour group leader, who is also Labour’s prospective Parliamentary candidate for Swindon North.
The outcome, to be discussed at Wednesday’s cabinet, says the cost of webcasting with the market leading solution, used by 70 other councils, would be more than £1,000 per meeting.
The report also sets out other cheaper options, including councillors or a volunteer resident recording meetings on their own devices and uploading footage to a free public hosting service; the council buying portable digital cameras, operated by staff members, and uploading the video; or streaming the audio only on Swindon 105.5.
But Coun Heenan said: “People would rather watch EastEnders or Coronation Street than watch a council meeting. I don’t think it will improve community engagement in any way. It’s a late 1990s idea that it will contribute in any way.
“It’s a real shame that, given the priorities and issues facing the borough, this is no more than a distraction and I cannot justify why the council should spend £90,000 over a few years.
”Many councillors already Tweet during the course of the meeting to the people which follow them on Twitter. And we reach a far wider audience that you would if the meeting was recorded.
“I would like to see that encouraged, and maybe there are other ways of doing social media, which is a fraction of cost and is more effective.
“The borough council has over 2,000 followers on its Twitter account. I have 120 and other councillors have 4/5/600 people following them. People can actually ask questions so they are re-Tweeting what we’ve said during the course of the meeting.”
However, Coun Heenan said the council needed to find a way to encourage councillors to use social media properly so it did not become a distraction in debates.
Coun Mark Dempsey said: “I think if we can find a cost-effective way, we should be webcasting.
“Tweeting is a second-hand account of a meeting. Webcasting gives people a first-hand account of a meeting.”
Comments(12)
stratton man
says...
12:42pm Sun 17 Mar 13
Hmmmf
says...
1:51pm Sun 17 Mar 13
AndyJH
says...
3:00pm Sun 17 Mar 13
As for being distracted, if you can’t multitask a little then you’re not going to be much use as a councillor anyway.
Webcasting meetings is nothing new and has been suggested many times, including by myself and others. I have even gone so far as to suggest that local libraries, which share the same council web server, could be used to allow residents unable to travel into the Civic Offices to ask public questions and view council meetings.
The fear I believe is not with the elected members, nor even the alleged costs, but certain archaic officers who rule the roost in a manner not dissimilar to “Sir Humphrey Appleby” Certain Officers certainly would not want recorded for all time the actual advice that they gave elected members and may well explain why council minutes contain scant details of actual events.
Oliver Dummassie
says...
3:58pm Sun 17 Mar 13
Nobody wants edited footage or chosen titbits of information.
If the council is attempting to demonstrate open and transparent democracy then it should not transmit anything less than full footage via a webcast
LordAshOfTheBrake
says...
7:09pm Sun 17 Mar 13
@AndyJH
The idea that you could accurately tweet in real time what is being discussed whilst being an active participant is ludicrous.
If you think otherwise, I suggest that you use your skills to keep the accurate minutes that you claim are lacking.
Silver Lining
says...
8:47pm Sun 17 Mar 13
Webcasts are expensive though and,given the financial pressures the council faces, I would have thought that it could be used in a better way.
At the end of the day, if anyone is remotely interested in listening to the meeting, they can go along to the meetings and watch them from the public gallery. That is, unless they haven'nt got some paint they want to watch dry!
Eastern Badger
says...
10:16pm Sun 17 Mar 13
house on the hill
says...
1:57pm Mon 18 Mar 13
1 2 Could B
says...
10:07pm Mon 18 Mar 13
Tim Newroman
says...
7:54am Tue 19 Mar 13
1 2 Could B wrote:Why do you even bother?
Youtube
1 2 Could B
says...
12:42pm Tue 19 Mar 13
Tim Newroman wrote:http://m.youtube.com
1 2 Could B wrote:Why do you even bother?
Youtube
/watch?v=_sTIXRxEsK0

sn5 says...
12:26pm Sun 17 Mar 13
Really, how many people are going to watch the broadcasts of the councillors?