Police await High Court decision on reinstatement of disgraced custody sergeant
10:29am Monday 22nd October 2012 in Latest News By Chris Melvin
Wiltshire Police is fighting not to reinstate Mark Andrews
Wiltshire Police are waiting to find out if it will have to reinstate a disgraced police officer sacked after a woman prisoner was injured at Melksham Police Station.
Sgt Mark Andrews was jailed in September 2010 for assaulting Pamela Somerville, 60, and was sacked by the force.
CCTV footage showed him dragging her across the floor of the custody unit before shoving her into a cell.
But his conviction was quashed after just six days in prison.
Wiltshire Police refused to allow him back to work, saying his behaviour was “well below the standards expected” but last December, the Independent Police Appeals Tribunal ordered the force to reinstate Sgt Andrews to his £36,000-a-year job and award him back pay.
The force is appealing that decision and on Friday took its fight to the High Court. A judge is now considering the case and will give his ruling in due course.
Temporary chief superintendent Paul Mills said: "Wiltshire Police sought judicial review of the Police Appeals Tribunal decision in 2011, which concluded that Mark Andrews should be reinstated as a police officer within the force.
"The force seeks judicial review, to reinstate the findings of an initial independent police misconduct hearing that took place in 2010, that concluded the conduct of Mr Andrews was such that he should be dismissed from Wiltshire Police.
"The justice in this matter has retired to consider the application and the force will be informed of the outcome in due course.
"Until such time that the force receives the decision and considers further potential legal avenues of appeal, Mr Andrews will not be reinstated into Wiltshire Police.
"At this time it would be inappropriate to comment further."
Ms Somerville, of Colerne, was arrested for failing to provide a breath test after being found asleep in her car. Charges against her were dropped.
Comments(8)
Tacho
says...
7:07pm Tue 23 Oct 12
You also don't appear to have condemned the drunken woman who was arrested in a vehicle,quite clearly she could have killed somebody. Before you start shouting she was innocent and was released, she has since been arrested and prosecuted for drink driving. Not so innocent perhaps.
harsh-but-true
says...
9:23pm Tue 23 Oct 12
Tacho wrote:I completely agree with the above comment, the media showed a meaty story without showing the full facts and behaviour of Pamela Sommerville.
You don't know the facts of this, you only saw what they wanted you to see. It makes good TV.
You also don't appear to have condemned the drunken woman who was arrested in a vehicle,quite clearly she could have killed somebody. Before you start shouting she was innocent and was released, she has since been arrested and prosecuted for drink driving. Not so innocent perhaps.
moonrakin wurzel
says...
12:28am Wed 24 Oct 12
Wake up ... this officer was reported by and testified against by his colleagues....
If was a case of provocation beyond endurance one must assume he'd be cut some slack .
I suppose you'd stand up for PC Simon Harwood too?
Mrs Donnyfly
says...
8:11am Wed 24 Oct 12
Errr... I don't think he got away with it exactly.
trowbridge52
says...
10:04am Thu 25 Oct 12
Tacho wrote:i never condemed her because i was talking about his behaviour nothing more weather she had been done for drink driving or not really does not concern me, the behaviour of the police officer just draggibng her was enough for me, no human weather male or female deserves to be dragged like that, and as moonrakin wurzel stated his colleagues reported him so for them to be concerned about his behaviour says it all, and as the hearing from the police misconduct board was for him to be sacked from the police force for his behaviour in 2010 i just think should be it now, how could his colleagues that reported him for this work with him again, sorry but i still dont think he deserves to be re instated and if i remember correctly he had been warned about this behaviour before.so i really dont think he should be re instated.
You don't know the facts of this, you only saw what they wanted you to see. It makes good TV.
You also don't appear to have condemned the drunken woman who was arrested in a vehicle,quite clearly she could have killed somebody. Before you start shouting she was innocent and was released, she has since been arrested and prosecuted for drink driving. Not so innocent perhaps.
trowbridge52
says...
10:05am Thu 25 Oct 12
bushranger
says...
11:42am Thu 25 Oct 12

trowbridge52 says...
9:08am Tue 23 Oct 12