Steve Halden wrote a letter in which he implies that Islam needs reformation. He wrote: “The complicated process of the reformation of the Islamic religion.” In that sentence he omits the causes of the problems in the wars in some Muslim countries.

He tells us the “conflict between Muslims” is “differing interpretations of the [Holy] Quran.” To someone who gets his/her knowledge of Islam from the media it seems that way. What he is referring to is what is happening in Syria and Iraq. Syria: there are colonial countries which want to change the regime because it’s not one of the loyal Arab head states in the region. Iraq: US and Britain invaded that country illegally and the rule of law diminished. It is a mess.

Elaboration: there are two stages which have been taking place for many years now. Stage one: destabilisation, either direct or indirect. In the case of Syria it is indirect. Let them do the job while supporting one element because they are useful. Stage two: Demoralisation. There is crisis and civil war. The peace is perished; the economy is disaster, no rule of law and no moral values.

I’d be interested to know Mr Halden’s calculation to point out the disputes among Muslims which are related to Islam. Would he be able to differentiate politics from religion? Would he acknowledge the atrocities of NATO, which has destroyed the rules of law in these countries and supports ‘useful’ groups to achieve its global power endeavour?

Axmed Bahjad Fleet Street Swindon